Film Incentive Program Among Bevin’s Proposed Budget Cuts

Print More


Kentucky’s Capitol Building

Gov. Matt Bevin proposed eliminating 70 state government programs during his budget address Tuesday night.

Not included in that list is a controversial and costly program he also plans to phase out: the film tax incentive program that has promised more than $148 million in incentives to filmmakers.

In a press release sent during Bevin’s speech, the governor said his budget closes the film subsidies to any new applicants. He didn’t explain the decision.

J. Tyler Franklin / KyCIR

Matt Bevin

A story from the Kentucky Center for Investigative Reporting last year found that the Kentucky Tourism Development Finance Authority began to hold its discussions about the projects in secret even as as the applications rose astronomically.

They also never rejected an application.

The program began modestly in 2009 under Gov. Steve Beshear. But in 2015, the legislature dramatically increased the subsidy to offer reimbursement up to 35 percent of in-state costs, without a cap. A huge uptick in new movie projects followed, and by October, the state had promised more than $148 million in incentives.

More than half of that money was approved in 2017 alone.

The finance authority was scheduled to hold a meeting last week, and it had nine new film projects to consider on the agenda. But the meeting was cancelled, for lack of a quorum.

Bevin’s proposal is not binding. Each chamber of the legislature will draft their own budgets before negotiating a final compromise.

In an emailed statement, Garry Gupton, spokesman for the Tourism, Arts and Heritage Cabinet, said the cabinet’s secretary recommended ending the program. The money saved would be reallocated to the general fund, Gupton said.

“In light of Kentucky’s current fiscal condition, we can no longer justify the potential expenditures of the film incentive program,” Gupton said.

.Americans for Prosperity-Kentucky, a libertarian-leaning advocacy group backed by the conservative Koch brothers, issued a statement Wednesday praising Bevin’s proposal and calling the film incentives “outrageous corporate welfare.”

This story has been updated.

Kate Howard can be reached at and (502) 814.6546.

  • Brian Halloran

    Someone once asked me if I would spend a penny for a bar of gold. No tricks. Give a penny, be handed a bar of gold. The answer is of course, yes. Of course you would. You’d be a damn fool not to spend that penny. The money/economic impact and tax revenue generated in the state is triple our quadruple the amount spend in incentives, the hundreds of good paying jobs both temporary and permanent created by the industry, and that is BEFORE you account for all the “free” and revolving advertising that these films generate, the good will that Kentucky receives from all over the country, the tourism related income and other tangible and intangible benefits to the state. The process isn’t easy and the people getting approved are serious filmmakers and companies who are coming here to Kentucky solely because of the incentive, spending tens of millions of dollars here ONLY because their behavior is incentivized. If this goes away, Kentucky loses hundreds of millions of dollars, hundreds or thousands of jobs, any goodwill it has built in the movie and TV industry, and the potential to create a new vision for Kentucky and a new way for the rest of the world to see our beloved state as something more than a backwater full of pill and heroin junkies who hold a horse race once a year and drink bourbon. The incentive is Kentucky’s penny. We should gladly pass it over for the bar of gold that is waiting.